I’m still a young enough professor that I don’t remember a time before “critical thinking” was a buzzword in the profession. Back in the fall of 2000, when first I started, John Bean convinced me that the goal of core-curriculum classes should be to introduce novices to the practices and standards of the university disciplines, and I still think that’s about right. A decade later, concerns had shifted to helping students engage in metacognition, the examination of one’s own thought-processes, and I’m still a fan of that as well. But some time in the last decade, if you believe some social psychologists, something went seriously wrong in American epistemology through entire limbs of the body politic, and in response a new call went forth: critical thinking became less a bonus and more a bulwark, something to save us from the idiocy that so many of us invite into our eyeballs through our phone screens. Dr. Bethany Kilcrease’s book Falsehood and Fallacy engages in that rescue mission at the undergraduate level, using the tools of history to improve our habits of thinking. Christian Humanist Profiles is glad to have Dr. Kilcrease on the show today.
Nathan Gilmour interviews Chris Gehrz about the recent book "The Pietist Vision of Christian Education," which Chris edited.
Nathan Gilmour interviews Caner Dagli, one of the General Editors of the new Harper Study Quran.
Slogans have always occupied our public attention, and the ways that an enemy redefines a slogan can be as important as the phrase’s original...